Citizens Liberty Organization / 🌎 Global Channels / 🔫the-armory [part 5]

really too generous in some ways. I got in the habit of going nose to charging handle but you can't see through an accupoint if you do that

But of you suck with irons and say that fancy optic has broken or suffered some sort of failure you can be up shits creek if facing off against people who are excellent shooters with just irons

My philosophy is always have a back up for anything

https://www.evike.com/images/large/evk-36551.jpg

Lmfao I love the spoon

> But of you suck with irons and say that fancy optic has broken or suffered some sort of failure you can be up shits creek if facing off against people who are excellent shooters with just irons @BugsyBaldwin things that are not real - that Irons break too.

Trijicon SRO on an arisaka offset mount seems like it may be a decent backup plan. I've got a rock solid scope mount but it's not QD

Just don’t break anything and you’re good to go. Problem solved

but I'm mean to my equipment

I mean I'm not nearly as bad as a marine buuuut

Lol

Sometimes you've gotta just bonk them

Just picked up an ADM UIC Mod 2

14.5

@Confused I would *not* put an SRO on a rifle

Nice! @bum

Better option? Maybe an aimpoint micro?

Anyone have any experience with Nightforce LPVOs?

Trying to enter into the LPVO world with an offset dot soon

nightforce lpvo's are good enough that I can't afford them lol

Lol

Or Kahles

I think flannel daddy has a video on their 1-8 ATACR

Rmr, T1 or acro @Confused, the sro isn’t rated for that

I thought about a Razer but I’ve seen people sending their shit into Vortex constantly

Nighforce is awesome

I’m heavily debating swapping my current 1-8 for a NF

Interesting, didn't know that the sro wasn't rated for that. I figured it was just an improved rmr

What are you using currently @Crye Salesman

What would you recommend for an offset dot

looks like they just suggested the rmr, T1, and acro

Acro or rmr?

If you had to pick one

Going from some quick specs and reviews, I'd lean towards the rmr due to the smaller size, larger window, and better battery life. Apparently a lot of people have been seeing the acro run out of battery in days instead of months or years

plus the rmr has been vetted to hell and gone over the years

I'd be half tempted to stick a dual illumination rmr on my rifle, though the smallest dot is 7moa. Not sure how I feel about that as I've never ran a reticle that big before

I have shot a fair amount of 22 short from cci what's the question?

Honestly its fairly quiet for an actual cartridge

But you can almost follow the projectile with your eye all the way to the target lol I used to shoot them out of a cheap little 22 revolver and a single shot youth 22 for shits and giggles

Next to no recoil and a nice little pop

Yeah the revolver made it a little louder

Slapped it on and honestly I kinda dig it. Only potential issue is that I think the turret cap and flashlight might get in the way of an offset red dot

Maybe not, judging by crye's pic. I guess the mount is higher up than i thought

a little goofy looking since the eye relief is so long it requires it to be mounted far forward, but the sight picture is natural when I bring it up

if your equipment cant take you abusing it, it's a range toy

I have two rifles. One is the trophy wife that shoots sub moa and has a carbon fiber handguard. The one shown in the picture is the kinky bitch who shoots 1moa and can be slapped around without hurting it

the max i'd be comfortable with in a duty rifle is like 4moa

you could still hit a mansize target out to a few hundred yards with that if you needed to

pref 1-3 moa tho and obv the lower the better

I’ve ran offset T1’s and RMR’s, and RMR’s on top of my primary optic. Just kinda depends what you’re doing. Dot size isn’t thattt important, you can be accurate with the fat dot, it’s just more annoying

Nice setup tho confused

Dual illuminated RMR’s are conceptually super cool, I have one on a backup pistol that stays hidden away in a pelican case, since it doesn’t take batteries. But on guns that get used frequently, they have shortfalls with lighting conditions

Does wearing plates make everything suck? Lol Backpacks suck on top Shouldering a rifle also sucks lol

Yes and yes, but you get used to it over time

It sucks a little. What really sucks is trying to work in a vehicle with a backpack

or camelbak, anything you can't take off

I put on my backpack Feels awkward af, straps overlap, shouldering the rifle is even worse 😒 Need to get used to it

Adjustable stock?

no stock, best stock...

sacrifice everything for reduced weight

Run around naked with an mp7 and mags duct taped to your chest. Absolute minimalist

With the possible exception of a camel back full of 5-hour energy so you can always operate at peak performance

Camel back full of cocaine laced liquid caffine

It's just an enema drip

instant absorption

We're joking about this, but this sounds absolutely terrifying to face

Funny enough, the 458 socom round was supposedly invented because they had difficulty putting down drugged up people in Somalia. They were thin as rails but wouldn't stop moving even after taking multiple hits because they were so far gone.

Interesting

They essentially created a lipstick can of a round that has the same muzzle energy as 7.62x51 but fires from a standard m4 magazine. Forget ballistic coefficient or long range. If someone's within around 150 yards, they're having a giant hole put in them.

Spicy 300blk

I mean, I prefer my .58 cal minnie balls, but you do you

Second the backpack thing. Innovation will inevitable cure that. Probably with some kind of super velcro

What if they made a backpack that attached via tubes on the back, and the bottom half wrapped around the waste?

I think I’m on to something here

I often am after 🏋️‍♀️ day

Could don and doff easy

These things exist

My biggest fetishized is modular load carriage integration

Dear fucking lord my dad did a dumb. So he's got this shitty bushmaster ar with a front sight post gas block that's crooked because the gas port is off center. His solution? Dremel part of the barrel extension pin so he can rotate the barrel in the receiver and align the sight post.

Uhhhh, why didn’t he just disassembled it and realign it?

The port is off center so the front sight post can't be aligned

So he turned the entire barrel a couple millimeters

Couldn’t he have turned the barrel nut? Or the upper itself is fucked up?

No I mean the gas port on the barrel isn't aligned with the barrel extension pin at the 12 oclock position. It's slightly off, and because it used a gas block with a permanent front sight post, it's not aligned with the upper

This is crooked because it has to be perfectly aligned with the gas port in the barrel

So I gave him a spare low profile gas block so he could ditch the shitty front sight and put an mlok handguard he bought on there. He doesn't want to ditch the rifle for something serviceable despite the fact that he makes in one hour what I make in a day

Ahhh, I got you. My AR had the A2 sight post too. That was the first thing that was changed on it. Low-pro gas block for the win.

I just hope his rifle doesn't explode

I imagine rotating the barrel extension could cause lockup issues and maybe even an oob

Uh

That is NOT it chief

What the he’ll

anyone got a S&W S9dv

The store, where they need to stay in my opinion

@littlebitt08 sorry for kate response. Had work stuff going on. But basically just EDC and home defense. I've been looking at fort Scott munitions but didnt know if there was something better. I'm running a cz p10f.

@Confused have your dad hook us all up with HKMR556 if he makes bankkk guyyy

Apparently the 416 failed inrange's mud test

The mud test is a cool idea but doesn’t make the most sense as a foolproof rest

Inrange's mud test usually ends when they litterally shove mud into the chamber, no gun is designed for that

Well the 416 has more external/exposed operating components than the traditional AR